Skip to main content
Menu
Search
Menu
Close

Car Camping Stoves

Published February 2020

How we tested

Ah, the great outdoors! While fresh air, exercise, and communing with nature all have their benefits, if you’re like me, the best part of camping is the food. Sure, food is a survival necessity, but there’s nothing quite like chowing down on a bowl of chili near the fire or waking up to mountain views and the smell of freshly made pancakes. However, unless you’re adept at live-fire cooking, you can’t enjoy camp food without a camp stove. 

The Difference Between Backcountry Stoves and Car Camping Stoves

Camping stoves fall into two categories: backcountry stoves and car camping stoves (also called “base camp” stoves). Backcountry stoves, which need to be extremely light and compact because they’re meant for carrying with you while hiking, are usually small apparatuses that sit on top of a fuel container and can hold one small pot. While you can cook meals on backcountry stoves with some finesse, they’re primarily meant for boiling water to add to ready-to-eat foods. Car camping stoves, referred to as such since you take them in your car to your campsite, are heavier than backcountry stoves and have one to three burners. For this testing, we focused on car camping stoves because they’re more versatile for campers interested in cooking. We tested eight models, priced from about $45 to about $240, and used them to boil water, make Easy Ground Beef Chili, prepare Perfect Scrambled Eggs, cook 1 pound of bacon, and make pancakes. Since it was also essential to see how the stoves performed in the wild, we also asked testers to take the stoves with them to camp sites around New England. 

Unpacking and Lighting Camp Stoves

Most camp stoves operate using a small fuel canister that you purchase separately. Many of the models we tested use propane, just like a gas grill, but in smaller containers. One stove required isopropane-butane (a mixture of different fuels usually sold in canisters at outdoor stores such as REI), and another could be operated with either propane or butane. We also included one camp stove fueled by wood; we were intrigued by its innovative design that uses heat from the fire to power a battery that can charge your phone or power a USB light. 

Butane and fuel mixtures such as isopropane-butane are often preferred for backcountry stoves because the cans are lighter to carry, but for car camping, where the weight of your gear doesn’t matter as much, propane is the most versatile option. Unlike butane, propane works at high altitudes and in temperatures below freezing. While we didn’t base our ratings on the type of fuel a stove required, it’s worth noting that 1-pound propane tanks for camping are much easier to find than butane canisters. 

Since camp stoves are essential for survival tasks such as boiling water for drinking, a camp stove should be easy to set up and ignite. However, we immediately encountered major difficulties while trying to start three of the stoves. We had to turn one stove upside down to attach its fuel canisters, and its flimsy knobs were easily knocked out of place, sending fuel spraying all over the fabric sides of the stove. It took three testers poring over the manual to figure out how to place the fuel canisters properly. Even then, this stove felt precarious to cook on; pans wobbled on its high, narrow cooking surface, and its thin wire control knobs shaped like paper clips bent when we turned them, making it impossible to judge when the gas was fully turned off. Professional cooks felt uncomfortable lighting and cooking on the stove, and we ultimately concluded it wasn’t safe to continue testing this model. 

One model had a finicky design that made it difficult to attach the fuel tank to the stove. If the fuel tank wasn't placed perfectly, it triggered a glitchy safety system. Each time the safety system tripped, we had to remove the fuel canister from the stove, reset the safety system, and try again. It took 12 tries to get just one of its burners lit; we had the same issue with its other burner. 

While gathering branches and twigs for the wood-fired camp stove sounded fun in theory, it was more of a chore in practice. If you’re in an area with limited wood, or you run out at night, you’re out of luck. And while you can, in theory, purchase wood logs to use in this stove,  you have to break them down with a hatchet into tiny 2-inch-long pieces that fit into the stove’s very small opening. One tester reported chopping wood for hours to power the grill through a dinner of burgers, sausage, and focaccia. We preferred stoves that we could set up and light quickly. We also liked stoves with automatic igniter buttons; they felt safer to use than stoves that we had to light with a match or utility grill lighter, and it was nice not to  have to rummage around for a lighter.  

Cooking on a Camp Stove

Before doing any cooking tests, we wanted to test each stove’s heat output by seeing how long it took each model to boil a quart of water. The burner power of the stoves we tested ranged from 8,000 BTUs (British Thermal Units) per burner to 20,000 BTUs per burner. Once lit and set to their highest heat setting, the stoves took from 4 to 11 minutes to boil the water, and these times correlated directly with each stove’s reported BTUs. The 20,000-BTU model was able to boil water in just 4 minutes at high heat. The 8,000-BTU model took the longest to boil water, followed by the wood-burning stove. (The wood-burning stove’s heat output cannot be measured in BTUs because the level of the fire built inside it can vary. However, even when positioned over a roaring fire, the pot of water took more than 10 minutes to boil, and that was after waiting 20 minutes for the stove to preheat.) 

While we preferred ripping-hot stoves that could boil water in minutes, the burners had to be responsive enough to accommodate a variety of high- and low-heat cooking tasks. We wanted a stove that could be turned down to low to gently simmer chili without scorching it and cook pancakes without burning them. This proved difficult on many of the stoves. Unlike home stoves that have knobs with numbers or clearly labeled low, medium, and high heat settings, many of the camp stoves had completely unlabeled or ambiguous knobs. Some turned as many as three complete rotations from off to high heat, so it was hard to figure out a low or medium heat setting. Three of the stoves were so finicky that when we tried turning down their heat levels, we often turned off the gas supply instead. A few stoves scorched the chili even when we adjusted the heat to its lowest setting.

Regulating heat levels on the wood-fired stove was also tricky. Heat generated by the wood fire activates a battery with helpful LED lights that tell you when the heat level is at its max, but the process of figuring out the right amount of wood to add at the right time was a delicate art. When the fire was at its peak, we were able to brown meat, but it was harder to regulate the stove’s flame during lower-heat tasks such as simmering chili and cooking pancakes. We preferred the simplicity of gas-powered models and liked products with clearly labeled knobs and responsive heat settings. 

Evaluating Ease of Use 

With limited resources out in the wilderness, a camp stove should be easy to use in all weather and with whatever cookware you have on hand. For this reason, we liked stoves with windscreens—flaps that can be positioned around the stove to prevent wind gusts from blowing out the flame. However, windscreens had a trade-off: They often limited the usable cooking surface of the stove. 

We also preferred stoves with roomier cooking surfaces. While all the stoves had two burners (except the wood-fired stove, which had one, large, grill-like surface), we found that the cooking surfaces on some of the stoves were too small to accommodate two pans at a time. When we tried to cook bacon in a 12-inch skillet and eggs in a 10-inch skillet, the two pans often didn’t fit directly over the burners or hung awkwardly off the cooking surface, with the heat concentrated on one side of the pan. We liked large, roomy cooktops that offered a fair amount of space between the two burners and plenty of room for whatever pans we were cooking with. Finally, we liked stoves that we could wipe down and carry easily and fold up quickly and compactly. 

The Best Car Camping Stove: The Camp Chef Mountain Series Everest High Pressure Two-Burner Stove

Our favorite car camping stove is the Camp Chef Mountain Series Everest High Pressure Two-Burner Stove. With 20,000 BTUs of power per burner and powered by easy-to-find propane, this stove boiled a quart of water in just about 4 minutes. Though it could get ripping hot for searing meat, the controls were easy to read and extremely responsive; we were able to quickly reduce the heat level to a gentle low for simmering chili or delicately scrambling eggs. It has all the extra features we like in a camp stove—an automatic igniter, a roomy cooking surface, and a windscreen—so you can enjoy the best part of camping, problem-free.


Methodology

  • Eight products, priced from about $45 to about $240, including five models that use propane, one that uses isopropane-butane, one that can use propane or butane, and one that uses wood
  • Time how long it takes to boil a quart of water on highest heat (repeat test on all burners)
  • Cook Easy Ground Beef Chili 
  • Cook Perfect Scrambled Eggs 
  • Cook 1 pound of bacon
  • Cook pancakes
  • Test cooking surface roominess with pans of differing sizes
  • Have users test at at campsites throughout New England

Rating Criteria

Heating: We evaluated the quality of the food produced by each model, taking into account the power and responsiveness of the burners.

Ease of Use: We evaluated how the design and size of each stove and its features influenced its performance. A team of testers took the stoves camping and reported back on their usability in the wild. 

Cleanup: We evaluated how easy the stoves were to clean.


Just for You: Try All of Our Sites

2 Months for Just $1


Get instant access to summer’s best recipes—smart, streamlined, foolproof:

  • 25 years of Cook's Illustrated, Cook's Country, and America's Test Kitchen foolproof recipes
  • NEW! Over 1,500 recipes from our award-winning cookbooks
  • In-depth videos of recipes and cooking techniques
  • SAVE all your Favorites for easy access
  • Up-to-Date reviews and product buying guides
Email is required
How we use your email address

The Results

Winner
Recommended

Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.

$248.64*
Recommended

Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.

$141.90*

Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

$67.99*
Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

$49.93*
Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.

$129.95*

Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.

$99.95*

Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.

$24.99*

Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.

$35.88*