Menu
Search
Menu
Close

We make mistakes so you don’t have to.

Get unlimited access to ALL our foolproof recipes, unbiased equipment reviews and ingredient ratings. Guaranteed to work for you.

Try CooksIllustrated.com Free for 14 Days

Email is required
How we use your email address

Roux Replacements

By Cook's Illustrated Published March 2009

Roux is often made with butter. Is oil an acceptable substitute?

Larousse Gastronomique defines roux as “a cooked mixture of equal amounts of flour and butter, used to thicken sauces.” Nevertheless, some recipes that borrow from classic French technique specifically call for making roux with oil (gumbo, for example). To find out if oil can be successfully used in a roux that calls for butter, we made a classic béchamel, or white sauce, with butter and compared it to béchamel made with neutral-tasting canola oil (we knew the distinctive flavor of olive oil would prevent it from being a viable substitute).

Tasters found the texture of the sauces identical. The sauces also tasted remarkably similar, though a few astute tasters thought the sauce made with butter was the richer of the two.

Next, we used these same sauces as part of a more complex dish, lasagna Bolognese. Here the flavor differences faded away, with the meaty tomato sauce overpowering the béchamel. Our recommendation: If the roux will be used in a dish that involves multiple flavors, go ahead and substitute canola oil for butter. If the roux will be used to thicken a simple sauce, it’s best to stick with butter.