Skip to main content

Nonstick Rimmed Baking Sheets

Published February 2021

How we tested

Rimmed baking sheets are some of the most used pans in our kitchens. Nonstick rimmed baking sheets offer many of the same benefits as their traditional counterparts, but they hold special appeal for people who prefer the ease of cooking with and cleaning nonstick equipment. Foods release easily from these pans without the use of parchment paper, silicone mats, or nonstick baking spray. But there’s a trade-off for that convenience: Nonstick cookware shouldn’t go in ovens hotter than 450 degrees or be used under the broiler. You also have to take care when using metal utensils or placing a wire rack inside the pans, as the nonstick coatings can become scratched. While we didn’t think these pans would replace our traditional rimmed baking sheets, we wanted to know if they could still be a useful addition to any kitchen.

We gathered a total of six models, priced from about $16 to about $35. We included pans with smooth cooking surfaces as well as several with textured surfaces. The pans we tested also ranged in color from pale gold to dark silver, and we even included one that was bright blue. We used each pan to bake cookies, roast Parmesan cauliflower, and contain caramel popcorn as it cooled. We examined how evenly the cookies and cauliflower browned and how easily all the foods released from the pans.

Testing Each Pan’s Nonstick Properties

It was difficult to tease out the differences in the pans’ nonstick coatings because all the companies use different terms to describe them. It was simplest to sort them into two categories: coatings that contain polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and those that don’t. PTFE is a chemical component used to make strong, slick, and flexible nonstick coatings, but it can release harmful fumes when exposed to high temperatures. We don’t recommend using cookware with coatings containing PTFE at temperatures above 450 degrees, and some cooks prefer to avoid PTFE altogether. We confirmed with manufacturers that the coatings of five of the six pans in our lineup contained PTFE—including two that are ceramic nonstick, a type of cookware that typically doesn't contain PTFE. The manufacturers of the other pan confirmed that their coatings do not contain PTFE.

Regardless of the type of coating, every pan we tested delivered on its promise to be nonstick. Cookies slid off the pans effortlessly, crispy Parmesan cauliflower was easy to remove, and the sticky caramel popcorn—the most challenging test—released with just a gentle nudge once it had hardened. We didn't have to chisel off food with a spatula or sacrifice some baked-on bits of cheese or cauliflower, as is sometimes the case when we use traditional rimmed baking sheets. Plus, with no stuck-on food to scrub off, cleaning these pans was fast and easy. 

Although we didn’t see any substantial performance differences between the coatings, we noticed that some models produced especially even and beautiful browning on cookies and cauliflower. Wondering why, we decided to take a close look at the pans’ other design differences.

We Like Standard-Size Baking Sheets Best

First, we looked at the size of the pans, which turned out to be an important variable. The flat cooking surface of a standard rimmed baking sheet measures 16½ inches by 11½ inches. Four of the pans in our lineup matched those measurements. However, two pans had slightly smaller cooking surfaces, up to ¼ inch shorter and 1 inch narrower. 

Those differences were minor, but they mattered. When we baked cookies in the smaller rimmed baking sheets, the cookies ran together. While we could fit all the cauliflower florets in the pans, the pieces were crowded. The florets didn’t brown properly or get crisp. Instead, they steamed and turned out soft, pale, and bland. The four standard-size pans performed better, as they provided enough space for the cookies to spread without running into one another and for the cauliflower to brown rather than steam. Given that recipes from most sources are developed with standard-size baking sheets, using a smaller pan will affect your results. 

What Made Some Baking Sheets Perform Better Than Others?

Cookies baked on three of the rimmed baking sheets were especially beautiful and evenly browned, and these pans had something in common: Their cooking surfaces had raised, textured patterns. The cookies likely baked more evenly on these pans because there is less direct contact between the food and pan, thus allowing for slower, more even cooking. We also liked the foods produced by the standard-size pan with a more traditional flat surface, though the cookies weren’t quite as evenly baked as those baked on pans with a textured surface.

Three Pans Came Out on Top

Three of the pans we tested exceeded our expectations with virtually identical top-notch performances. One of them—the USA Pan Half Sheet Baking Pan—had PTFE-free nonstick coating. The other two—the OXO Good Grips Non-Stick Pro Half Sheet Pan and the Williams Sonoma Goldtouch Corrugated Nonstick Half Sheet Pan—are coated with a more traditional nonstick material that contains PTFE. The surfaces of all three pans were impressively slick and ensured that food practically jumped off them. At the time of testing, the prices of our three favorite nonstick baking sheets ranged from about $19 to about $30. We’ve listed them below in order of price, giving the edge to the least expensive model. Be aware that they might need to be replaced more frequently than traditional rimmed baking sheets since all nonstick coatings will eventually wear away. To get the most use out of them, we recommend taking some care with these pans: Hand-wash them, avoid using metal utensils and wire racks inside the pans, and don’t expose them to oven temperatures higher than 450 degrees (this includes broiling, too). These rimmed baking sheets are perfect for baking cookies and jelly roll cakes or when cooking anything particularly delicate or sticky. Nonstick rimmed baking sheets won’t replace traditional rimmed baking sheets in our kitchen, but if you value ease of use and cleanup, these might be a useful addition to your cookware collection.


Rating Criteria

Nonstick Ability: We evaluated how easily food released from each pan.

Performance: We evaluated how evenly food cooked and whether the browning was consistent. 

Size: We evaluated the size of each pan’s cooking surface. 

The Results


Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.


Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.


Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.


Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.


Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.


Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.