Skip to main content

Disposable Bowls

Published September 2020

How we tested

What do macaroni salad, baked beans, and ice cream all have in common? You’ve probably, at one point or another, eaten them out of a disposable bowl.

Disposable bowls are ubiquitous at picnics, family gatherings, and birthday parties for their convenience and ease of cleanup. But when you think about it, your disposable bowl experience may well be unfavorable: bowls that crush too easily in your hands, fly away with a whisper of the wind, or develop soggy bottoms within minutes of being filled with food. 

We set out to find the best disposable bowl—one that was durable and comfortable to hold and eat from—and tested 12 models, priced from about $0.05 to about $0.80 per bowl. First, we ate fruit salad from each and evaluated their abilities to withstand repeated slices and pokes of a disposable fork and knife, and then we ate hot baked beans from them with a disposable spoon. Next, we let hot soup and ice cream cake sit in separate sets of each bowl for 30 minutes before checking them for any signs of sogginess or damage.

Which Disposable Bowls Were the Most Comfortable to Hold and Eat From? 

Since we often hold a disposable bowl while eating from it, such as when at a party or picnic, we knew that a good disposable bowl needed to feel comfortable in our hands, especially when filled with hot food. We were looking for a few key attributes: a wide rim, a wide base, and short walls. A wide, sturdy rim would allow us to easily pick up the bowls, especially when they were full of hot baked beans or when we were removing them from a microwave. A bowl with a wide base would be more secure to hold and easier to grip. 

Bowls with smaller bases were typically more tapered in shape and therefore had taller walls than those with wider bases. The higher the walls, the tougher it was to eat from the bowls, as the angles made it harder to see food and use utensils. Bowls with shorter walls allowed us to more easily access our food, whether we were scooping beans with a spoon or piercing and cutting pieces of fruit with a fork and knife.

Which Disposable Bowls Were the Most Durable? 

Durability depended on the materials the bowls were made from (foam, compostable materials, or coated paper) and whether or not they were coated with a waterproof seal. The two foam bowls in our lineup were too flimsy and too easily punctured with a disposable fork and knife. They were also the only two models that weren’t microwave-safe. 

While the seven compostable models held up to repeated cuts and pokes and contained the ice cream cake without becoming soggy, they struggled with hot foods. When we added hot baked beans and chicken noodle soup separately to two sets of each model, their bottoms (and often their sides) became soft and the outsides of the bowls felt sweaty. Even though these bowls were supposedly microwave-safe, we found that a stint in the microwave to heat up chicken noodle soup made the sides precariously soft and malleable. 

The most durable disposable bowls were made from paper and had waterproof coatings. While the company would not divulge more specifics about what their coatings are made from, they are most likely an acrylic-based coating, according to Clean Production Action. No matter the temperature of the foods they contained, these bowls didn’t become soggy, sustained no damage when we tried cutting and poking them, and withstood being microwaved without any issues. 

The Best Disposable Bowls: Dixie Ultra Heavy Duty 20oz Disposable Paper Bowls

Our favorite disposable bowls are the Dixie Ultra Heavy Duty 20oz Disposable Paper Bowls which cost about $3.50 for 26 bowls (about $0.13 per bowl). Both functional and durable, these bowls showed barely any scratches after the fork and knife test and, thanks to their waterproof coating, no signs of wear and tear after the ice cream cake, hot baked beans, and soup tests. We liked their big rims, which were helpful when picking the bowls up and when grabbing them from the microwave. Their wide base and low sides also made the bowls easy to hold and eat from. With a 20-ounce capacity, they were a bit large for side dishes or desserts, but we found them to be the perfect size for main courses and large salads. 

We also liked the Dixie Everyday 10oz Disposable Paper Bowls, 36 Count, which cost about $3.00 for 36 bowls (about $0.08 per bowl). These bowls had smaller rims, which meant that they were tougher to grab and pick up, but their smaller size made them ideal for side dishes and desserts, and they were just as durable as our favorite bowls. Made with the same material and coating as our favorites, these paper bowls held up well to both hot and cold food tests and didn’t become damaged by the microwave or the disposable utensils. We also appreciated their wide base and low sides, which made them easy to hold and eat from. 

Our favorite compostable model was the Stack Man 100% Compostable 12 oz. Paper Bowls [125-Pack], which cost about $13.00 for 125 bowls (about $0.10 per bowl). While they didn’t hold up well to hot foods, they were easy to use and had wide rims and bases and short walls. We also liked their thicker sides, which prevented them from getting as soggy as other compostable bowls when filled with baked beans and soup. We think these are a great compostable option for many different kinds of picnic fare (potato salad, fruit salad, and desserts)—just avoid putting superhot food in them. 


  • Test 12 disposable bowls in a range of sizes (from 10 to 20 ounces), priced from about $0.05 to about $0.80 per bowl, including three made from coated paper, two made from foam, and seven made from compostable materials 
  • Eat fruit salad from each bowl, using a disposable knife to cut any large pieces of fruit and a disposable fork to spear fruit 
  • Eat hot baked beans from each bowl, using a disposable spoon and holding the bowl with one hand
  • For the microwave-safe models, heat chicken noodle soup in each bowl until it’s nearly boiling, let it sit for 30 minutes, and then check the bowl for damage 
  • For the non-microwave-safe bowls, add near-boiling chicken soup to each bowl, let it sit for 30 minutes, and then check the bowl for damage 
  • Add a slice of ice cream cake to each bowl, let it sit for 30 minutes, and then check the bowl for damage 


Ease of Use: We evaluated how comfortable the bowls were to hold and eat from. 

Durability: We noted if the bowls withstood punctures and if they remained undamaged by hot and cold foods.

The Results


Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.


Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.


Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.


Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.


Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.


Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.