Skip to main content
Menu
Search
Menu
Close

Indoor Smokeless Grills

Published October 2019
Update, March 2020
Our top-rated smokeless grill from Krups has been discontinued. Because we can only recommend the next-best option with reservations, we recommend our favorite grill pan, the Lodge Square Grill Pan, for grilling indoors.

How we tested

Don’t have a yard? Weather not cooperating? Smokeless grills promise to let you bring the cookout indoors, allowing you to grill in the comfort of your own kitchen—without setting off the smoke alarm. These electric grills claim to eliminate or reduce the smoke generated when searing food, supposedly by using infrared heating elements, specially angled fans, and/or water pans. Some also come with griddle plates that can be substituted for the grill grates, so you can also use these gadgets to make pancakes or panini. More and more of these grills have been introduced to the market in the last few years, and we wanted to know whether any were worth buying. So we bought five models, priced from about $50 to about $220, and used them to grill asparagus spears, steaks, and burgers, comparing the results to the same foods cooked in our favorite cast-iron grill pan.

Smoke Reduction Comes at the Expense of Flavor

As we soon found out, none of these smokeless grills eliminated smoke entirely. In fact, we’re not sure that any of the smoke-reducing features the grills boast actually did much at all. Foods grilled on two of the models we tested did produce significantly less smoke than the same foods when cooked in the grill pan, but that was only because the grates of these smokeless grills didn’t get or stay hot enough to sear the foods. When we tried to heat these grills to a high temperature of 450 degrees, one model topped out at about 390 degrees while another only reached 430 degrees in a few isolated spots. Foods barely even sizzled on these two grills, and the results were insipid: steaks and asparagus spears that were only lightly browned and burgers that looked more steamed than grilled. 

The other three grills we tested performed better. With grates that heated to at least 450 degrees, and often much higher, these models did a decent job of searing foods. And in general, foods cooked on these grills generated less smoke than the same foods cooked in the grill pan, which we also heated to 450 degrees during high-heat cooking applications for comparison’s sake. But the hotter the grill surfaces got, the more smoke they produced. 

That said, foods cooked in the grill pan looked and tasted much better than those cooked on the smokeless grills. Most of the smokeless grill grates are made from thin cast aluminum, while the grill pans are made from thick cast iron, which retained far more heat than the smokeless grill grates. Because of its superior heat retention, the grill pan’s surface temperature rebounded quickly when we added food. As a result, food seared better, acquiring good char and intense grill flavor, and in much less time: Asparagus, for example, took about 7 minutes to cook on the grill pan and charred better than the asparagus cooked on any of the smokeless grills, which took almost twice as long on average. 

The More Surface Area, the Better

Performance concerns aside, a few factors made some of the smokeless grills easier to use than others. First, we preferred grills that provided an ample amount of cooking space, big enough to accommodate a large flank steak. Our favorite model had the biggest surface area—a generous 180 square inches (about the size of a large placemat), which is more than twice as big as our favorite grill pan. As a result, it can grill twice as much food at a time—an advantage if you’re cooking for a crowd.

Good Controls Are Important

An electric grill isn’t very useful if you can’t easily set its temperature. We vastly preferred models that had specific temperature settings. One model had just two settings, “keep warm” and “on,” limiting our ability to moderate the heat depending on what we were cooking. The symbols for these two settings were also surprisingly cryptic, requiring us to consult the manual in an attempt to interpret them. Only by using a temperature probe did we learn what these settings actually indicated. Another model had settings that ranged from 1 to 5, and we were again forced to guess the temperatures these numbers indicated. Worse still, when we used a temperature probe to find out, we found that there was no functional difference between settings 3, 4, and 5, with all of them heating to a high of 530 degrees—an alarming figure, considering that the grill grates are coated with a nonstick material that can degrade and release toxic fumes above 500 degrees.

The best smokeless grills provided a wide range of temperatures and featured dials or digital displays that were easy to use and clearly and accurately indicated the correct temperatures. Our favorite model was equipped with a digital display that made it especially easy to choose a specific temperature. Testers liked that this feature allowed us to set and forget the heat level without guessing or fiddling with the controls, as we would when cooking on a stovetop. Better still, we could set the two sides of the grill to different temperatures in case we wanted to simultaneously cook, say, a piece of fish over high heat and some vegetables over a slightly lower heat. 

Cleanup Matters, Too

Finally, we considered how easy it was to clean the smokeless grills. Because the grates on some of these smokeless grills are coated with a nonstick material and can be thrown in the dishwasher, they do require a little less elbow grease to clean than our favorite stovetop grill pan, which must be washed by hand. But the grill pan has simplicity on its side—there’s only one thing to clean. We preferred grills with embedded heating elements and as few parts that needed to be cleaned as possible—just a grill grate or grates and a drip tray. These models were easier and less messy to dismantle than grills that had extra parts to clean, such as a removable heating element and/or water pan.

The Best Smokeless Grill: The Krups Digital Indoor Smokeless Grill

If the flavor of your food is your primary concern and you don’t mind putting up with a bit more smoke, we think our favorite grill pan, the Lodge Square Grill Pan (about $19), is your best bet for grilling indoors, as it makes flavorful, nicely charred food. But if your priority is to reduce the smoke you generate while grilling indoors and you’re willing to sacrifice a little flavor to do so, the Krups Digital Indoor Smokeless Grill is a fine choice. Its large cooking surface is divided into two heating zones, and testers appreciated its clear, accurate digital controls, which made it especially easy to use. And because it’s capable of heating to relatively high temperatures, it does a decent job of searing food. 


Methodology

— Five smokeless grills priced from about $50 to about $220
— Grill asparagus 
— Grill steaks
— Grill burgers 
— Cook asparagus, steaks, and burgers in favorite cast-iron grill pan and compare results to results of foods cooked on smokeless grills
— Wash and dry five times according to manufacturers’ instructions
— All models purchased online, and the prices listed are the prices we paid

Rating Criteria

Performance: Grills that turned out well-charred, savory foods with good grill flavor rated more highly.

Smokiness: We considered the volume of smoke each grill generated; grills that produced less smoke than our favorite grill pan rated more highly.

Ease of Use: We evaluated how easy it was to select, attain, and maintain different temperatures; how accurate those temperature settings were; and how easily the cooking surfaces of the grills accommodated large foods or large volumes of food.

Ease of Cleanup: We evaluated how easy it was to clean the grills.



3 Sites. No Paywalls.

Included in your trial membership

  • 25 years of Cook's Illustrated, Cook's Country, and America's Test Kitchen foolproof recipes
  • NEW! Over 1,500 recipes from our award-winning cookbooks
  • In-depth videos of recipes and cooking techniques
  • SAVE all your Favorites for easy access
  • Up-to-Date reviews and product buying guides

Get America's Test Kitchen All Access — become the Smartest Cook you know, guaranteed.

Email is required
How we use your email address

The Results

Winner
Recommended

Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.

$248.64*
Recommended

Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.

$141.90*

Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

$67.99*
Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

$49.93*
Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.

$129.95*

Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.

$99.95*

Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.

$24.99*

Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.

$35.88*