Skip to main content

Cookware Sets

Published June 2019
Update, February 2020
The Best Buy cookware set from Tramontina has been discontinued, and the closest replacement from that company is a more expensive set with smaller pans in sizes we don't find as useful. In its place, we are promoting the Goldilocks cookware set as our new Best Buy.

How we tested

If you want to cook with confidence—or help a novice cook get a solid start—quality cookware is essential. You don’t have to spend a ton of money; choosing well is key. We usually insist that you buy cookware piece by piece so you pay for only what you need. To help keep track of everything, we've put together a comprehensive guide to stocking a kitchen with cookware, featuring both essential items and a few handy extras. Even so, people continue to ask us about cookware sets. There have been some interesting developments since the last time we tested cookware sets, so we decided to take another look, buying eight sets priced from about $160 to about $560, including the winning and Best Buy sets from our previous testing.

What’s Wrong With (Most) Cookware Sets

Cookware sets are different from most kitchen products in that manufacturers typically customize the contents of sets for retailers, meaning that two 10-piece sets from the same brand at different stores can contain different pans. Some sets also contain oddball additions such as colanders to plump up the total number of pieces and make a set seem more valuable. (Lids count as pieces, too.) What’s worse, manufacturers often cut costs by shrinking the pans. As a result, it’s rare to find what we regard as “full-size” cookware, such as a 12-inch skillet, 4-quart saucepan, or 8- to 12-quart stockpot, in a set. Too-small, crowded pans tend to boil over, steam instead of sear, and take longer to accomplish some cooking tasks because they require cooking food in batches.  

Frankly, quality can also be an issue: We’ve seen cookware sets for astonishingly low prices, but too many consist of a pile of flimsy, nonstick-coated aluminum pans. They’re not capable of transmitting heat uniformly—and they’re not durable. It’s false economy if you’re constantly fighting your pans just to cook a good meal and you replace them every few years.

However, we recently found new brands that take a different approach. They focus on construction quality, sell directly to consumers to reduce prices, and offer standard combinations of pans, with some even featuring practical pieces of full-size cookware. We rounded up five of these sets, as well as an innovative set launched by a brand we’ve liked in the past.

What’s In Cookware Sets?

Nearly all the sets we bought contained the following pans (all slightly smaller than we preferred): a 10-inch skillet, a 3-quart saucepan, a 3-quart sauté pan (a deep, lidded frying pan with tall sides), and a 5-quart (or larger) stockpot. Most sets had additional pans, but we focused our testing on the four they had in common to help us compare set to set. In the skillets, we seared steaks, made pan sauce, and browned beef for shepherd’s pie. In the saucepans, we browned butter and boiled and mashed potatoes to top the shepherd’s pies. In the stockpots, we seared batches of beef for stew and tried to cook 2 pounds of angel hair pasta to test their capacity. In the sauté pans, we shallow-fried Swedish meatballs, pouring off the hot oil and building the creamy sauce with the fond, and sautéed heaps of chopped kale. We asked additional testers to try the pans and then finished with abuse-testing to gauge the durability of each skillet, since that’s the hardest-working pan in most kitchens. Throughout testing, we hand-washed the pans and rated them on how easy they were to handle and maintain.

Form Equals Function in Cookware Sets

We were pleased that every set contained fully clad cookware composed of three or more layers of aluminum and stainless steel bonded together. In previous testings, we’ve found that fully clad pans benefit from the qualities of the combined metals to heat more evenly and brown foods more uniformly than pans made of other materials or by other methods. Not surprisingly, then, every set produced acceptable food and most seemed solidly built.

That said, we did have preferences among the sets. Design features such as uncomfortable handles or handles that heated up on the stovetop made pans less easy to use. Handle angles mattered, too, especially when hoisting heavy stockpots or sliding skillets full of shepherd’s pie under hot broilers to brown the potato topping. Dutch ovens and skillets that provided larger cooking surfaces allowed us to brown meat in fewer batches and speed up cooking. Wider openings on saucepans and stockpots helped us see and keep food moving, which was helpful when stirring browned butter; lower, more flared (rather than cupped) sides on skillets helped steam evaporate and food brown evenly. The balance of a pan’s weight, an underrated design element that affects cooking efficiency, became particularly evident when lifting handled skillets and saucepans. Some sets’ pans felt off-balance, clunky, and harder to lift and maneuver, whether we were sautéing foods or scooping out sauce.

So, Do Sets Have All the Pans You Need?

One of the attractions of a cookware set is the idea that someone wiser has preassembled the most functional combination of pieces for you. That’s not always the case: Two of the sets in our lineup had no stockpot or Dutch oven; their largest vessels topped out at 3 quarts, not big enough to cook 2 pounds of angel hair pasta or to make our beef stew recipe. These sets lost points for lacking the pans we deemed necessary for a foundational package of cookware. (One of these sets included a santoku knife instead; we’d rather have additional cookware in our sets.)

When comparing similar pieces from each of the sets, too-small or oddly shaped cookware was an issue. One of the 10-inch skillets tapered down to just 7 inches of available cooking surface, barely enough room for a single steak. Browning ground beef for the shepherd’s pie in this pan was frustrating, since pieces were constantly falling onto the stovetop if we didn’t stir very carefully. It was interesting that all the sets included sauté pans: We don’t find them essential and typically reach for a 12-inch skillet or 7-quart Dutch oven instead. Stockpots were a major issue; two sets didn’t have them at all, as we noted above, and at least two more sets had pretty liberal definitions of the term: One set contained a miniature pot that claimed to hold 5 quarts. It did, technically, if filled up to the rim, but at just 8.5 inches in diameter (rim to rim) with sides 5.25 inches tall, it was barely bigger than our favorite large saucepan, which is 8 inches across and 5 inches tall. We could cook a single pound of angel hair in it, but it took work to prevent the pasta from clumping.

An innovative “compact” set from a familiar brand had a different version of a 5-quart stockpot: It was as flattened and low-sided as a sauté pan. Again, we barely managed to cook just 1 pound of pasta in it, and water splashed everywhere as we frantically tried to prevent clumping.

The Best Cookware Set: All-Clad D3 Tri-Ply Bonded Cookware Set, 10 Piece

None of the new sets bested our former favorites. Our top-ranked set was the 10-piece All-Clad D3 Tri-Ply Bonded Cookware Set. This fully clad cookware is hard to beat with its clean, “Goldilocks” design of sturdiness without heaviness, outstanding cooking performance, and remarkable durability. It costs about $560, but when you consider that the 8-quart stockpot it includes costs nearly $340 on its own, this set is a comparative bargain and a worthwhile investment that will last a lifetime. Our runner-up, the Tramontina Gourmet 12-Piece Tri-Ply Clad Cookware Set, contained an astonishing number of full-size pans and is moderately priced at about $230. Slightly less well-balanced and well designed than the All-Clad, it nonetheless performed admirably and is durable to boot. Of the new sets, we did have a favorite: For an inexpensive set with an excellent selection of well-designed, fully clad pans, the Potluck Cookware Set, which costs about $160, pleasantly surprised us. We were heartbroken when the skillet warped during our final round of abuse testing, making us realize that this set probably won’t hold up as long as our top two picks, but for a starter set, it’s a decent choice. Finally, if you'd rather build a set yourself using our favorite models from our exhaustive equipment reviews of individual pieces of equipment, we suggest viewing our guide to building your own cookware set


We tested eight cookware sets, comparing the skillets, saucepans, sauté pans, and stockpots or Dutch ovens from each set. In the skillets, we made steak with pan sauce and browned beef for shepherd’s pie. In the saucepans, we browned butter and made the mashed potatoes for the shepherd’s pie. In the sauté pans, we made Swedish meatballs and sautéed kale. In the stockpots/Dutch ovens, we cooked angel hair pasta and made beef Burgundy. We rated the four pieces of cookware on their performance, ease of use, and cleanup/durability. We also evaluated the full composition of pans in each set. We purchased all the sets online, and the prices shown are what we paid. Products appear in order of preference.


Composition of Set: We rated each set on the number of functional pieces it contained, giving higher marks to a good selection of essential cookware in useful sizes.

Performance: We awarded points to pans that produced well-cooked food, comparing each pan in a set against the same pan in the other sets and to our test kitchen winner in that category.

Ease of Use: We awarded points to pans in any given set with design features, such as balance and handle position and design, that made them easy and comfortable to use.

The Results


Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.


Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.


Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.


Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.


Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.


Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.