Skip to main content

Flexible Cutting Mats

Published March 2018

How we tested

A good-quality cutting board is essential. Our favorites are big, sturdy, and durable, but sometimes we like to supplement them with lighter-weight options. Enter flexible cutting mats. Lightweight and made from dishwasher-safe plastic, they can be easily tucked into the dishwasher after use—a convenience that we especially appreciate when working with messy raw proteins. They're also generally flexible enough to roll up like a newspaper and funnel ingredients directly into a skillet or bowl. We purchased eight, including products sold in packs of four or five and one that's sold individually, priced from about $2.00 to about $8.00 per mat. We put them through their paces with a slew of cutting and chopping tasks, evaluating how well they stood up to stains, odors, repeated knife strokes, and washing.

We Wanted Mats That Stay in Place

Flexible cutting mats are often double-sided, and they can be used directly on the counter or placed atop a larger cutting board. We tried them in each position. No matter how they're arranged, they're simply more prone to slipping than standard cutting boards. Some rocked back and forth or spun in circles, even when we used a damp paper towel to try to anchor them in place. Slick foods, such as halved onions and raw chicken, also sometimes slid on the mats. In this evaluation, the surfaces of the mats proved to be more important than their thickness or weight. Perfectly smooth mats tended to slip or skate around on the counter. The mats that felt most stable—both on the counter and atop a cutting board—had swirls, tiny raised dots, or grid patterns. If they were textured on only one side, we preferred to place that side on the counter for extra stability, but mats that were textured on both sides stayed put better and provided more traction for slick foods.

Are Bigger Mats Better?

We also preferred midsize mats. Some were so dinky that chicken pieces slid off as we pounded them and diced onion spilled onto the counter. But one mat was too big to be convenient; the extra space was useful for cutting, but at 18 by 24 inches, it was difficult to store and wouldn't fit in most dishwashers. The most versatile boards measured about 11 by 14 inches (the same as our winning small cutting board), making them big enough to contain all the food we were preparing but still compact enough to easily maneuver around the kitchen and put in the dishwasher.

The Best Mats Combine Strength and Flexibility

A handy benefit of flexible cutting mats is that you can bend them to funnel ingredients into bowls and cookware, so we used the mats to ferry chopped onions, carrots, celery, and broccoli around the kitchen after cutting the vegetables on the mats. We also transferred flour to the bowl of a stand mixer, a simple task that often results in flour spilled everywhere. Mats that were too stiff and rigid could only be tilted into skillets or mixing bowls, and that was no more effective than working with traditional flat cutting boards. Truly flexible mats tidily funneled their contents precisely where we wanted them.

Here, thickness was key. The most rigid mats in our lineup were also the thickest, measuring between 2 and 3 millimeters thick, about the same as the cover of a hardback book. But thinner wasn't always better. One mat was just 0.50 millimeters thick (thinner than a credit card), so it felt flimsy and was hard to pick up from the counter. The sweet spot was between 0.77 and 1.46 millimeters. Our favorite mat, which was both flexible and strong, fell at the high end of that range.

Are Flexible Cutting Mats Durable?

Since most of these mats are inexpensive and come in packs of four or five, we don't expect them to be as durable as traditional cutting boards. Each product had visible knife marks after testing, but some showed egregious wear and tear. A few became stained or warped. The colorful trim flaked off one product, leaving behind a sticky residue. Again, the mats with textured surfaces had an advantage: Those bumps and swirls deflected and concealed knife marks, so the mats were significantly less worn.

In the end, we found a set of flexible cutting mats that we'll be glad to have on hand for quick, messy cutting tasks and to easily transfer ingredients. Dexas Heavy Duty Grippmats were the perfect size: large enough to fit a significant amount of food but not so big as to make cleaning and handling a pain. They also struck the right balance between strength and flexibility, and they're textured on both sides for better stability.


We tested eight flexible cutting mats, including products sold in sets of four or five or individually, priced from about $2.00 to about $8.00 per mat. We used one mat from each set throughout testing, preparing raw produce and chicken and transferring those ingredients to a skillet, mixing bowls, and a stand mixer. Three additional testers chopped onions, carrots, and celery on the mats, using them both directly on the counter and on top of our favorite plastic cutting board. We evaluated the mats' size and shape, as well as its thickness, to help determine their sturdiness, stability, and flexibilty. We also rated them on durability, stain and odor resistance, and ease of cleanup. All models were purchased online and appear in order of preference.

Size: Mats that were oversize or too small to contain moderate amounts of food rated poorly. The best mats contained food and mess without dirtying the surrounding counter.

Stability: We rated the mats on how securely they sat on the counter, docking points from mats that spun, slipped, or rocked significantly.

Flexibility: The highest-ranked mats were flexible enough to funnel ingredients into skillets or bowls but didn't feel flimsy.

Durability: We evaluated each mat on how resistant it was to knife damage.

Cleanup: Mats fared best if they resisted stains and odors, were easy to clean, and didn't peel or warp in the dishwasher.

3 Sites. No Paywalls.

Included in your trial membership

  • 25 years of Cook's Illustrated, Cook's Country, and America's Test Kitchen foolproof recipes
  • NEW! Over 1,500 recipes from our award-winning cookbooks
  • In-depth videos of recipes and cooking techniques
  • SAVE all your Favorites for easy access
  • Up-to-Date reviews and product buying guides

Get America's Test Kitchen All Access — become the Smartest Cook you know, guaranteed.

Email is required
How we use your email address

The Results


Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.


Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.


Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.


Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.


Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.


Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.