Get the story
Vegetable “noodles” aren’t going away, but tabletop spiralizers are bulky. Are smaller, handheld versions up to the task?
Handheld spiralizers promise to cut ribbons and noodles from a variety of produce without taking up as much room as tabletop models. They’re simple tools that operate like pepper mills or pencil sharpeners: Holding the canister-like base with one hand, you use your other hand (or a pronged holder) to twist a piece of produce over a series of blades set into the spiralizer’s top, and noodles or ribbons come out the other side. We wanted to know if any of them could compete with our favorite tabletop spiralizer, the Paderno World Cuisine Tri-Blade Plastic Spiral Vegetable Slicer ($33.24). So we tested four models, priced from $14.95 to $24.99, and compared them with the Tri-Blade, using each to spiralize zucchini, beets, apples, carrots, and butternut squashes.
Testers appreciated the smaller footprint and uncomplicated design of the handheld models; they’re easier than the tabletop models to set up and clean and more intuitive to use. But the admiration largely ended there. Most of the handheld models had sharp blades and were capable of making nice-looking ribbons and noodles from all the produce we threw at them, but they took about six times as long as the Tri-Blade to do so: The handheld models processed a single 8-ounce zucchini in an average of about 2 minutes, while our favorite tabletop model breezed through it in 30 seconds.
Worse, the handheld versions took a lot of effort to operate—it’s hard on the wrists to twist a zucchini around and around for 2 minutes, let alone a chunk of dense butternut squash. It’s even more difficult for left-handed cooks: Because of the positions of the blades, produce can only be twisted clockwise, a direction that lefties found particularly awkward. And while a few of the models came with rubbery bands to make the bases more secure, most were made of slippery, hard-to-grip plastic. If you’re cooking for more than yourself—for example, spiralizing the six zucchini needed to feed four people—the time (12 minutes) and labor can add up.
Moreover, the handheld models required users to trim the sides and sometimes the lengths of longer, wider produce before it could be spiralized—an annoying extra step that isn’t necessary when you spiralize on the Tri-Blade. We preferred models with canisters at least 2.5 inches in diameter, as these allowed us to trim less off the sides of wider pieces of produce. We also preferred models that didn’t make us cut long produce in half in order to fit inside the canisters, as two of the models did.
We’ll take a faster, more efficient tabletop spiralizer over a slower, more labor-intensive handheld model any day. Still, if you have limited storage space and plan to use your spiralizer only occasionally, some models are better than others. We liked models that came with three different blades because they were more versatile. While all of them came with a ribbon blade, two of the models included only a single noodle blade—either a ⅛-inch spaghetti blade or a ¼-inch linguine blade—limiting our options.
A fair option exists: With a rubbery grip and a relatively wide mouth, the OXO Good Grips 3-Blade Handheld Spiralizer ($24.99) was the easiest and most comfortable to use of the handheld models. And because it comes with three blades, it’s one of the more versatile versions on the market.
We tested four handheld spiralizers priced from $14.95 to $24.99, pitting them against our winning tabletop spiralizer and using each to produce noodles and ribbons from zucchini, beets, apples, carrots, and butternut squashes. All models were purchased online and appear in order of preference.
Ease of Use: We evaluated the spiralizers on how intuitive they were to operative and how much work was required to prepare produce for spiralizing.
Comfort: We evaluated the spiralizers on how comfortable they were to hold.
Versatility: We evaluated the spiralizers on the number and type of spiralizing options they offered.
Though it’s no match for a tabletop model, this grippy, wide-mouthed model was the easiest and most comfortable to use of the handheld models. And because it comes with three blades, it’s one of the more versatile versions available. This model has no trouble with longer produce, but wider produce will need to be trimmed to fit the 2.5-inch width of its canister—a step our winning tabletop model does not require.
Performing similarly to our top-rated model, this handheld spiralizer was relatively easy to hold and operate. It required users to trim the sides, though not the length, of wide produce in order to fit its 2.5-inch-wide canister—extra work not required with our winning tabletop model. But it comes with only a ribbon blade and a ¼-inch linguine blade; we’ve found that a ⅛-inch spaghetti blade is more useful for most recipes.
The length and sides of produce had to be trimmed extensively to fit inside this slim, 2-inch-wide spiralizer, which came with only two blades. And testers found the design of the model awkward: In order to use it, you have to squeeze the canister tightly, fatiguing your wrists.
This spiralizer had three different blades—but its design made it such a pain to use that this versatility was practically moot. Shaped like a pencil sharpener, it forced users to hold the gadget in the air and twist endlessly, exhausting our wrists within moments. (By contrast, the other models could be rested on the cutting board.) The handles and pronged vegetable holder were made of slick plastic, and the attached holder and tapered tip required us to trim both the sides and length of produce before it could be spiralized.