Measuring Spoons

Published April 2012

How we tested

When you’re shopping for measuring spoons, you can find enough choices to make your head spin: plastic or metal, magnetic or looped on a chain, long- or short-handled, round, oval, or square—even in the shape of hearts and flowers (get real!). Does any of this affect how well the spoons function? We gathered eight sets, priced from $4.84 to $21.99: our old favorite and seven challengers. The spoons we tested were made from both plastic and stainless steel. They came in varying shapes and designs, and to be included, they had to have 1-tablespoon, 1-teaspoon, 1/2-teaspoon, 1/4-teaspoon, and 1/8-teaspoon measures. (Our recipes often call for 1/8 teaspoon, but many sets on the market don’t include this size.)

We used every spoon in each set to perform common tasks: measuring liquid and flour and scooping spices and herbs from narrow jars, including leafy, static-prone dried oregano; powdery ground sage; granular celery seeds; and slippery red pepper flakes. We assessed how easy and comfortable the spoons were to use, averaging the opinions of testers, and finally ran the spoons through many dishwasher cycles to check how well they’d hold up over time. If numbers faded, bowls warped, stains materialized, or spoons rusted, they were out of the running.

You’d think that when you measure out a tablespoon, you’re getting exactly a tablespoon. That’s the point of a measuring spoon, after all. In fact, manufacturers may not have the size perfect on every spoon in a set, plus design flaws can make perfect measurements difficult. To confirm the accuracy of each spoon, we carefully measured water and weighed it on a sensitive scale, repeating this multiple times with multiple testers and averaging the results. It was clear which spoons were consistently over or under the mark. True, the worst offenders were inaccurate by no more than 1 gram. But if you consider that a gram is nearly the weight of 1/4 teaspoon of water, your precisely measured ingredients will be incorrect. Our top choices were almost perfectly accurate for each spoon in the set, and their designs facilitated precise measurements.

In the test kitchen, we have found that the most accurate way to measure dry ingredients is a method we call “dip and sweep.” You scoop up a heaping spoonful of the ingredient and then sweep across the rim of the measuring spoon with a flat blade to level the contents. Not all spoons in our lineup allowed this. Some had a bump or dip in the handle where it met the bowl, making it hard to get a clean sweep. Dipping was difficult and uncomfortable with some sets, especially those with spoons with thick handles tightly attached to their mates, making us hold a fistful of bulky spoons while we measured. Spoons with narrow handles were easier to use as long as they were lightweight. Sure, you could simply detach the spoons from the rings, but then you have to hunt for unlinked spoons in your kitchen drawers. We preferred spoons that were comfortable to use while on the ring or that could be easily pulled off (and returned to) their rings.

For reaching into spice jars, shorter, thicker handles were a hindrance. The most expensive set we tested had the longest handles—nearly 5 inches. But their heft proved uncomfortable. We preferred sets with slim metal handles for compact storage; a few plastic sets were too chunky and bulky, and static cling made some spices stick to plastic spoons. Metal wasn’t always the answer, though: After a few dishwasher cycles, two metal sets showed rust (including one that claimed to be “stainless” steel).

After taking the measure of every set, we had a tie between one set made from plastic and one from metal. Both offered accurate spoons with long, comfortable handles that extend on a level plane for easy sweeping. With the metal winner, the slim design made using the spoons on the ring simple and comfortable; the plastic set’s bulkier spoons popped on and off the ring easily. The majority of our testers, however, preferred the metal set, which simply felt sturdier in our hands. Our old favorite nudged out the runner-up by a nose.

Try All Access Membership Free for 14 Days

Included in your trial membership

  • 25 years of Cook's Illustrated, Cook's Country, and America's Test Kitchen foolproof recipes
  • In-depth videos of recipes and cooking techniques
  • SAVE all your Favorites for easy access
  • Up-to-Date reviews and product buying guides

Get America's Test Kitchen All Access — become the Smartest Cook you know, guaranteed.

Email is required
How we use your email address

The Results


Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.


Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.


Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.


Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.


Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.


Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.